Understanding the Recent 6-3 Supreme Court Decision on Agency Deference
July 1, 2024
The recent 6-3 Supreme Court decision in the Loper Bright case overturns the 1984 “Chevron deference” precedent, rejecting the practice of federal courts deferring to governmental agencies on legal interpretations of ambiguous statutory language.
The impact of this ruling is significant as it shifts the balance of power between agencies and the judiciary in interpreting laws and deciding the best ways to apply them. Moving forward, federal courts are likely to engage in a more thorough review of agency interpretations, rule-making and actions.
- This decision, the Supreme Court’s ruling last week rejecting the SEC’s in-house enforcement of securities fraud claims, and the recent decision of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the SEC’s Private Fund Adviser Rules, significantly limit the SEC’s reach over private fund advisers. However, this will likely not impact the SEC’s general focus on fiduciary considerations and the duty to disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest in their examinations, investigations, and enforcement sweeps of investment advisers.
The 6-3 decision, along ideological lines, discards a 1984 precedent directing federal courts to defer to agency legal interpretations when the statutory language passed by Congress is ambiguous.
View referenced article
Author(s)
Related Insights
August 18, 2026
PTAB Trial Insights
Navigating IPR Discretionary Denial White Waters with Examiner Error: A Practitioner's Guide
Decided five years before the surge of discretionary denial decisions in 2025, the second prong of Advanced Bionics requires the Director to determine “whether the petitioner has demonstrated that the Office erred in a manner material to the patentability of challenged claims” when the same or substantially the same art or arguments previously were presented to the Office.
August 17, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Recent SAT Publications on Fraudulent CFDIs – Immediate Risks for Your Business
The Tax Administration Service (SAT) continues to audit taxpayers as part of the new expedited domiciliary audit procedure, through which it can determine whether the digital tax invoices (CFDI) issued by such taxpayers are fraudulent.
August 17, 2026
Health Care Law Today
FQHCs: The Expanding Landscape of Medicare Billing Outside of PPS for Care Management Services
Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are primarily reimbursed by Medicare through the Prospective Payment System (PPS), which pays a per-visit rate to cover a typical bundle of medically necessary services provided during a patient encounter. Increasingly, however, FQHCs have opportunities to bill certain care management services to Medicare outside the PPS bundle. The steady expansion of these services over the last decade is one of the most significant changes to Medicare FQHC reimbursement since the Affordable Care Act (ACA).