President Trump’s Inauguration Day Immigration Executive Orders

During President Trump’s first hours in the White House, he issued a sweeping series of executive orders, including several regarding immigration policy: Protecting the American People Against Invasion, Securing Our Borders, and Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship (the “Immigration Orders”). These immigration-related executive orders come as no surprise, considering the president’s numerous campaign promises to strictly enforce immigration law and to direct an influx of resources to curb the flow of illegal immigration into the United States.

The first immigration order, Protecting the American People Against Invasion, is a revocation of multiple executive orders issued by the Biden Administration, which were aimed at initiating immigration reform. These include:

Executive Order 13993 of January 20, 2021 (Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities), which was itself a revocation of a 2017 Trump Executive Order aimed at increasing immigration enforcement;

Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 2021 (Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework To Address the Causes of Migration, To Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and To Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border);

Executive Order 14011 of February 2, 2021 (Establishment of Interagency Task Force on the Reunification of Families); and

Executive Order 14012 of February 2, 2021 (Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans).

The Protecting the American People Against Invasion Executive Order also states that the Attorney General, in coordination with the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, should act to prioritize the prosecution of criminal offenses related to illegal immigration. Notably, it also includes directives to register illegal aliens, and states that fail to comply with those legal obligations are to be treated as a civil and criminal enforcement priority. The order further states that sanctuary jurisdictions who interfere with federal enforcement operations will be broadly barred from receiving federal funding.

The second immigration-related Executive Order, Securing Our Borders, directs the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to prioritize the construction of physical barriers and the deployment of personnel at the southern border. It also includes the termination of the “catch-and-release” policy and parole programs, including the “Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans,” which allowed individuals from those countries who have a sponsor and pass a background check to work and live in the United States for up to two years under a “humanitarian parole” period.

The third immigration-related Executive Order, Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship, ends birthright citizenship, a right guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment, for those individuals:

(1) born to mothers who were in the U.S. illegally during their birth and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents during their birth; and

(2) whose mother’s presence during their birth was lawful, but temporary, and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents at the time of their birth.

While this order will be subject to challenge (Executive Orders cannot lawfully conflict with the Constitution or its Amendments), such challenges will take time, and the order is set to take effect 30 days from the date of issuance; though it is likely that the first-filed lawsuits will seek an injunction precluding enforcement. This includes a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in New Hampshire federal court on January 20, challenging the constitutionality of such an executive order restricting birthright citizenship. We can expect that other organizations will file lawsuits challenging this and other executive orders issued by President Trump. In fact, as of press time, there were two additional lawsuits filed (one in Washington state and one in Massachusetts) on behalf of a total of 22 states and other jurisdictions seeking to enjoin the order.

These orders are the first of what are likely to be many changes in immigration law and enforcement. As covered by today’s companion article, employers need to stay tuned and be prepared for increased audits and enforcement actions.

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.