USPTO Director Squires released updated guidance on AI-assisted inventions. The new guidance states that AI-assisted inventions are subject to the same legal standard for determining inventorship as any other invention. Notably, the guidance rescinds the previous guidance, which applied the Pannu factors for determining inventorship, treating AI as an unnamed joint inventor. The new guidance should simplify the analysis in determining when a natural person has created an invention with assistance from AI.
There is no separate or modified [inventorship]
View referenced article
standard for AI-assisted inventions.

Author(s)
Related Insights
December 8, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
2026 Outlook: AI, IPOs, and the New “Normal” in Venture & Private Equity
Key Takeaways The 2026 outlook for market activity is cautiously optimistic amid ongoing challenges.Private equity firms are shifting to…
December 8, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Guyana: A Primer on a Strategic U.S. Caribbean & South American Ally
December 5, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.