A Round Up of Key Trends in Health Care Private Equity Investments

08 May 2019 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Christopher J. Donovan Alexandra B. Shalom

This conference season, private equity (PE) investors and provider compared notes on the current state of the markets, trends, opportunities and challenges. Below is a summary of key trends that have been discussed.

A recent Health Care Private Equity Panel during the Young Jewish Professionals CEO Healthcare Symposium, co-sponsored by Foley and moderated by Foley partner Chris Donovan, explored the strategies of different investment funds. Speakers included Bob Schulz of Health Enterprise Partners, Ameya Agge of BlueMountain Capital Management, and Richard Mattera of Optum. Currently, health care represents 18% of the gross domestic product and that already significant percentage is expected to grow. Given the high level of spending, and despite the range of strategies and focal points in the health care market that varies from middle market to distressed investing, each panelist shared the common goal of lowering the total cost of health care while enhancing outcomes. Panelists emphasized the attractiveness of target investments that reduce costs of care without impairing quality. Many of those investments are capital intensive, involve information technology/data spend of a high magnitude, or require significant scaling to achieve a level of profitability to warrant the initial investment.

Given these capital demands, larger PE/hedge funds and strategic investors have become more nimble at structuring investments either as joint ventures or through structural capital “stack” models coupled with certain exit and governance rights to make PE a valuable and indispensable player in the evolving healthcare ecosystem. These novel models, when compared to the traditional growth equity and buyout models, are seen as a trend line that will be embraced by sellers and buyers, especially larger providers and systems, that may seek to access the benefits or private capital but not sacrificing clinical and other strategic control.

All speakers agreed that private equity would be a key player in the ongoing consolidation of many sectors in health care, especially outpatient services that have historically been highly localized, siloed, and disaggregated.

Four Key Takeaways for Private Investors

Another panel of PE Investors discussed four key takeaways that highlight some unique features of the current market at the iiBIG’s Investment and M&A Opportunities in Health Care conference. Chris Donovan moderated the session and panelists included Andrew Farris, Director – Private Equity Investment Team of BlackRock PE Partners, Fred Lee, Head of Business Origination of Leerink Revelation Partners, and Larry Simon, Partner of Clearview Capital.

  1. Partnerships. Large systems are challenged by slim inpatient margins and are making bolder bets in outpatient and ancillary service areas. To do that, in many cases, requires significant capital for IT, personnel, new infrastructure and dedicated standalone assets and capabilities to service the system and potentially third parties. Health systems are finding that PE is a ready and capable capital partner to share the capital burden without ceding clinical and financial control over key areas.
  2. Financial Structuring.  Recent deals have evidenced a willingness by PE to partner with strategics to create a financial arrangement that both satisfies PE’s return targets as well as a strategic strategy objective. For example, the panel referenced the recent Kindred deal involving Humana, TPG Capital, and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe that features put/call rights amongst the investor parties as a good example of a PE return structure wrapped around a strategic goal of Humana to acquire home health and hospice providers for their MA plans.
  3. The Effect of Social Determinants of Health.  Increasingly, PE will be asking targets how to fill in the blanks on some assumptions on underwriting that may have previously been overlooked. For example, has the target included social determinants of health criteria in its pro forma modeling in terms of upside on revenue through better clinical outcomes at lower cost and downside? Has the target identified any social determinants of health that, as addressed, could improve outcomes? If so, at what cost and is reimbursement available (directly or on a quality basis) therefore?
  4. Platform Creation. The current highly active auction and valuation market in certain areas (e.g. health care information technology, physician practice management specialties (PPMs), and autism) are requiring PE to do more platform “creation” on their dime and with their capital. For example, a specialty physician practice with adequate EBITDA levels in a given market may not simply exist and need to be formed out of a series of smaller practices with the PE firm identifying synergies, revenue capture opportunities, and cost duplication. Creating the platform, as opposed to buying one, is time consuming and can negatively impact return. However, it can be done at a lower initial valuation with a higher degree of confidence that pro forma returns will be realized.


Given the trends that have recently been covered in various conferences, PE continues to invest aggressively in the health care market. Given the high capital needs in a dynamic market, disaggregated provider niches in need of consolidation and the pressure on all players to reduce cost and add value; PE will be a major player in shaping health care M&A markets for the foreseeable future.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.