Foley hosted a deep dive webinar into the Revised Stark and Kickback Rules. Our expert panelists from Foley presented a comprehensive and detailed look at the new final rules issued by CMS and the OIG on Stark and the Anti–Kickback Statute. They discussed:
- The new Stark exceptions and AKS safe harbors for value based arrangements, and why some may not be all that important just yet
- Other new Stark exceptions and AKS safe harbors, including the new “limited remuneration” ($5,000) to a physician exception, cyber–security donation exception and removal of sunset for the EHR donation rules
- Changes to existing exceptions and safe harbors, including how the change to an AKS safe harbor may affect gainsharing and co–management agreements between hospitals and physicians
- Revisions to important Stark definitions and how they may affect arrangements our clients may enter into
- Important clarifications and interpretations that may offer additional flexibility or contain some pitfalls for the unwary
- And more!
Click here for a video recording of the full presentation.
People
Related Insights
17 February 2025
Foley Viewpoints
6 Steps to Manage Tariff Risks in a Trade War
As Trump seeks to raise U.S. tariffs (which currently tend to be among the lowest worldwide), manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and other companies that frequently import must determine the best strategy to deal with the resulting uncertainties.
25 February 2025
Events
Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Contracts: Mitigating Financial and Legal Risks
Join Foley and Lardner LLP partners Greg Husisian, Leah Imbrogno, and Vanessa Miller on Tuesday, February 25, for a Strafford CLE webinar, “Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Contracts: Mitigating Financial and Legal Risks.”
17 February 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Navigating Non-Compete Agreements: Key Considerations for In-House Counsel in Franchise Businesses
In May of last year, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to ban non-compete agreements in most employment contracts. Franchise agreements were an exception. However, before the rule could take effect in September, a federal court vacated the ruling in August, asserting that the FTC lacked the authority to enforce such a regulation.