Updated California automatic renewal law: what businesses need to know
December 28, 2021
Originally published in Reuters Westlaw on December 28, 2021. Reprinted with permission.
Foley attorneys Saige Gallop, Catherine Zhu, Natasha Allen and Louis Lehot discuss steps businesses should take to ensure compliance with a newly amended California law that requires specific types of notification for consumer subscriptions that automatically renew. Click below for the full article.
Disclaimer
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 16, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
A Room with a View: What the Secondaries Boom Is Really Telling Us About Private Markets
Five and a half years ago, our team joined Foley & Lardner to restart its presence in San Francisco. The firm had deep roots across the country, but we believed it needed a real home in the place where so much of the private capital story actually gets written. Not a satellite office. A home.
June 2, 2026
Foley Ignite
It's Time to Get Going
I spent yesterday afternoon in New York at the Nasdaq MarketSite for the Sidebar Summit, and I moderated a panel on markets, AI, and capital formation. Sidebar Summit was part of a series of events comprising New York Tech Week. I want to share what I took away, because the timing of the day turned out to be almost too good to script.
May 21, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Working on Borrowed Time? The Risk-Reward Calculus of Recourse Notes for Equity
One of the more nuanced tools in the executive compensation toolkit is the use of a recourse promissory note issued by an employer to facilitate an employee’s exercise of stock options or purchase of restricted shares.