Sectors
RJ McVeigh headshot.

Raymond J. McVeigh

Associate

Raymond J. McVeigh

Associate

R.J. McVeigh is a commercial litigator who represents companies and executives in high‑stakes business disputes involving complex manufacturing and supply‑chain litigation, contractual breakdowns, executive and employee separations, and non‑compete and fiduciary claims. He advises clients across industries where litigation strategy must account for business continuity, workforce stability, and operational risk.

R.J. regularly serves in lead‑associate and day‑to‑day case‑management roles on significant matters, where he is trusted with shaping litigation strategy, directing discovery and motion practice, and driving disputes toward efficient resolution. He is frequently involved at critical inflection points in litigation, including emergency injunctive relief, dispositive motion practice, and matters involving sensitive employment and executive‑level issues, where early strategy materially affects leverage and outcome.

A significant part of R.J.’s practice involves manufacturers and suppliers in commercial and supply‑chain disputes, including litigation involving breach of contract, warranty claims, pricing and tooling disputes, and continuity‑of‑supply issues. His work frequently involves technically complex factual records and multi‑party business relationships, including matters arising in the automotive and manufacturing sectors, where supply disruption and regulatory pressure heighten litigation risk.

R.J. also has substantial experience representing employment‑related and executive separation disputes, including litigation over non‑compete and restrictive covenant agreements, fiduciary obligations, compensation and commissions, and disputes arising from departures of senior employees or teams. He represents both companies and groups of executives in matters requiring careful coordination of legal strategy, business objectives, and reputational considerations.

In addition to litigation, R.J. counsels clients on risk mitigation and dispute‑avoidance strategies, including emerging issues at the intersection of technology and commercial relationships. As manufacturers and suppliers increasingly rely on automation, data analytics, and artificial intelligence in sourcing, forecasting, logistics, and workforce management, R.J. advises on how these technologies can affect contractual obligations, employment decisions, and downstream litigation risk.

Prior to joining Foley, R.J. served as a law clerk to the Honorable Daniel P. Collins of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He earned his J.D., with honors, from Harvard Law School, where he held leadership roles on the Harvard Law Review and the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.

Representative Experience

  • Leads dispositive motion practice in complex commercial litigation, securing dismissal of claims and significantly reducing client exposure at pivotal stages of dispute resolution.
  • Serves as lead associate in non‑compete, restrictive covenant, and executive‑level employment disputes, guiding strategy in matters involving departing executives, employee teams, and fiduciary‑duty allegations.
  • Obtains temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions in urgent business and employment disputes to halt ongoing harm, protect confidential information, and preserve customer and workforce stability.
  • Represents manufacturers and suppliers in commercial and supply‑chain litigation, including disputes involving breach of contract, warranty claims, pricing and tooling disagreements, and supply disruptions.
  • Oversees discovery and motion practice in multi‑year, high‑stakes litigation involving extensive records, technical issues, and cross‑border business relationships, driving matters toward early resolution or favorable dispositive outcomes.
  • Authors and contributes to industry‑focused thought leadership addressing developments in commercial litigation, employment‑related disputes, and manufacturing and supply‑chain risk.

Presentations and Publications

  • Co-author, “Sixth Circuit Finds Automotive Supplier’s ‘Blanket Contract’ Did Not Create Requirements Contract, Citing Airboss,” Foley Dashboard Insights (June 2024)
View from inside a modern car with autonomous driving features, showing digital dashboard displays and augmented reality navigation on the windshield—ideal for busy lawyers in Chicago on the move.
January 15, 2025 Manufacturing Industry Advisor

BIS Finalizes Rule Prohibiting Connected Vehicle Imports Linked to China and Russia: Key Compliance Requirements Announced

The U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has promulgated a Final Rule prohibiting the import and sale of connected vehicles and related components linked to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Russia.
Aerial view of a busy shipping port at sunset, showing rows of colorful shipping containers, cranes, trains, and docked ships—much like the organized efficiency found in top law offices specializing in intellectual property law.
December 31, 2024 Manufacturing Industry Advisor

The State of the Law of Requirements Contracts

Amid increasing pressure on supply chains across the globe, multiple recent court opinions have disrupted the law of requirements contracts.
Close-up of a car’s digital dashboard displaying navigation route, speedometer, total distance, and average speed—similar to how law offices offer clear litigation support to guide clients. The steering wheel is partially visible on the left.
October 10, 2024 Foley Viewpoints

Proposed Rule Targeting Connected Vehicles Will Impose Major New Supply Chain Compliance Requirements on Automotive Companies that Source from Russia or China

On September 26, 2024, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if finalized, would prohibit the sale or import of certain automotive hardware and software, as well as “connected vehicles” incorporating this technology, from or linked to the People’s Republic of China or Russia.
Aerial view of colorful shipping containers stacked on a cargo ship beside a bridge with vehicles over dark water, capturing the dynamic energy of Chicago—home to top corporate law offices and leading lawyers in Chicago.
July 25, 2024 Manufacturing Industry Advisor

Changing Requirements: Recent Disruptions to the Law of Requirements Contracts

Amid increasing pressure on supply chains across the globe, multiple recent court opinions have disrupted the law of requirements contracts – contracts regularly relied upon across industries by many original equipment manufacturers and suppliers.
Close-up view of several large stone columns with vertical grooves, typical of classical architecture, lined up in a row—an elegant look often found at prestigious corporate law office entrances.
June 3, 2024 Blogs

Sixth Circuit Finds Automotive Supplier’s “Blanket Contract” Did Not Create Requirements Contract, Citing Airboss

On May 23, 2024, the Sixth Circuit became the latest court to analyze last year’s Michigan Supreme Court decision of MSSC, Inc. v. Airboss Flexible Prods. Co. (“Airboss”), finding that an automotive supplier’s “blanket contract” was not enforceable due to its failure to satisfy the statute of frauds—upending years of the parties’ performance under the alleged requirements contract.
February 21, 2024 Manufacturing Industry Advisor

Simultaneous Obstructions to the Suez and Panama Canals Threaten the Global Supply Chain

The Suez Canal and Panama Canal connect critical international trade and supply chains across continents.