Reacting To The Novel Coronavirus

Reaction to the novel coronavirus—the SARS-CoV-2 virus—is changing every day as jurisdictions take measures to limit the spread of infection. Foley & Lardner LLP has formed a multi-disciplinary Coronavirus Task Force, which is staying abreast of the latest developments, responding to evolving client needs, and providing a robust, online library of alerts, insights and thought leadership on the business implications and legal considerations related to the outbreak. Foley’s Coronavirus Resource Center is available to help your business react—and be proactive—during this challenging time. Below, we outline March 16, 2020 updates from the USPTO, federal district courts, and Federal Circuit.

The USPTO Reacts To The Novel Coronavirus

The USPTO has announced that, out of “an abundance of caution,” all USPTO offices will be closed to the public beginning Monday, March 16, 2020, until further notice. The USPTO previously announced that all in-person meetings with members of the public would be conducted remotely instead, including all examiner interviews, PTAB/TTAB hearings, and similar meetings. Nevertheless, and while the USPTO always encourages electronic filing, we have confirmed that documents still can be filed by “hand carry” delivery to the Customer Service Window in the Randolph Building at 401 Dulany Street, in Alexandria, Virginia.

Deadlines, including new and existing patent and trademark application, prosecution, and PTAB deadlines, are not extended. However, the USPTO “considers the effects of the Coronavirus outbreak” to be an “extraordinary situation” within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.183 and 37 CFR 2.146 for affected patent and trademark applicants, patentees, reexamination parties, and trademark owners, and will waive the fee for certain petitions to revive if the delay in filing the reply that led to the abandonment was “due to the effects of the Coronavirus outbreak.”

Federal District Courts React To The Novel Coronavirus

Federal district courts are limiting public access and many are postponing hearings and even trials based on advice from state and local health officials.

The Federal Circuit Reacts To The Novel Coronavirus

As stated in a public advisory and administrative order issued March 16, 2020, the Federal Circuit has restricted access to the National Courts Building complex in order to protect the safety and health both of court staff and the public. The only public access permitted will be counsel and parties with scheduled in-person hearings and members of the press with media credentials. Even for those people, access will be limited to the lobby, courtroom, reception area, public corridors, and attorney lounge areas. The order does not alter or extend any deadlines, and will remain in effect until amended or rescinded. The court previously limited in-person hearings to those in which counsel is local to the National Capitol area, and either canceled other hearings or changed them to be telephonic. Documents to be delivered to or filed with the court may be submitted by mail or deposited in the court’s night box located at the garage entrance on H Street NW, between 15th Street and Madison Place, Washington, D.C.

Companies React To The Novel Coronavirus

While companies are shifting towards a work-from-home paradigm to protect employee and public health, they should not lose sight of the cybersecurity and data security risks associated with a remote workforce. This article from Foley’s Coronavirus Resource Center highlights steps companies can consider implementing to mitigate the risks of suffering negative impacts from the protective measures they are taking against the coronavirus.

Disclaimer

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.