Sectors
A man in a dark pinstripe suit, white shirt, and red patterned tie stands in front of a blurred office background, reflecting the professionalism of top lawyers in Chicago.

John E. Turlais

Of Counsel

John E. Turlais

Of Counsel

John Turlais is a member of Foley & Lardner LLP’s Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations Practice Group. His practice focuses on international trade and customs law, advising clients on tariff classification, duty mitigation strategies, valuation and origin issues, and enforcement matters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). He regularly assists companies in navigating complex import compliance requirements, preparing and submitting prior disclosures, responding to CBP inquiries and audits, and managing corrective actions related to Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, country-of-origin marking, classification, and forced-labor issues.

In addition to his customs work, John advises clients on broader international trade compliance, including export controls under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR), economic sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and anti-bribery/anti-corruption (ABC) compliance under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

John also has significant experience conducting international compliance risk assessments and designing and improving compliance programs for companies of all sizes – from multinational corporations with established programs to small and mid-sized firms expanding globally. He frequently helps clients develop or enhance their internal controls, due diligence processes, and employee training programs tailored to their specific trade and regulatory risk profiles. John also has extensive experience conducting internal investigations and defending clients facing enforcement actions by the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies.

John provides clients with practical, risk-based guidance and designs implementable international trade and ABC compliance solutions suited to clients’ needs and budgets. In recognition of his work developing tools to help mid-sized companies assess corruption risks and respond to issues more efficiently and effectively, John has received the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Legal Innovator award and the Milwaukee BizTimes’ I.Q. (Innovation Quotient) award.

John understands that it is critically important to have a coordinated, multijurisdictional response to multinational enforcement actions. To that end, he helped establish an international defense alliance, the ConciliumTM Global Network, composed of compliance, investigations, and government enforcement defense attorneys located in countries around the world. John also serves as the FCPA advisor to a software firm developing online ABC modules specifically designed for training multinational companies operating in India.

John is a frequent writer and speaker on topics related to the international trade compliance, internal investigations, and cross-border government defense strategies. For a list of his publications, please see the Insights section below.

Before joining Foley, John co-founded ProjectLearn USA, Inc., an educational company that provided information and strategies on developing study practices and test-taking skills. John also played professional baseball in the Pittsburgh Pirates and New York Mets organizations.

Awards and Recognition

  • State Bar of Wisconsin, Pro Bono Honor Society
  • State Bar of Wisconsin, Legal Innovator award
  • Milwaukee BizTimes, I.Q. (Innovation Quotient) award
  • Wisconsin Super Lawyers® – Rising Star (2011–2013)

Community Involvement

  • Member of the board of directors of Broadscope Disability Services
  • Past member of the board of directors of the Oak Creek Girls Youth Basketball Association
A large blue shipping container is being lifted by an orange crane among stacks of colorful containers at a port, reminiscent of the organization seen in top Chicago lawyers’ corporate law offices.
June 24, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … The First Use of Economic Sanctions to Target Intellectual Property Theft

Rather than treating trade-secret misappropriation solely as a commercial dispute, the United States is showing a willingness to use economic sanctions — traditionally reserved for threats such as terrorism and proliferation — to deter and punish large-scale IP theft.
June 18, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … The New Customs Enforcement Realities (Part I): Managing Rising Bond and Collateral Requirements

The Trump Administration's new tariff initiatives are reshaping the importing environment in ways that extend far beyond the tariff rates themselves. Increased duties are driving higher customs bond requirements, new executive actions are signaling a more aggressive enforcement posture, and importers are facing growing pressure to ensure that their compliance programs can withstand heightened scrutiny.
June 18, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … The Government’s IEEPA Federal Circuit Appeal

For months, the U.S. Government has signaled it would challenge the Court of International Trade’s (CIT) authority to require refunds of IEEPA tariff payments for “finally liquidated” entries (those more than 90 days after liquidation). That challenge has now arrived. In recent CIT filings and in its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the Government has argued that the CIT cannot order the return of finally liquidated IEEPA tariff payments, except for plaintiffs that have filed protective actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i).
June 18, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … The Emerging Battle Over Who Ultimately Keeps IEEPA Tariffs

For much of the past year, the principal focus of the IEEPA tariff litigation has been whether the tariffs were lawful and whether importers would ultimately be entitled to refunds. Following the Supreme Court's February 2026 decision invalidating the tariffs and the subsequent proceedings before the Court of International Trade, those questions have largely been answered. The focus has increasingly shifted from whether refunds should be paid to how those refunds will be processed, administered, and distributed.
Close-up of various international banknotes, including euro, yen, yuan, and US dollar, arranged in overlapping horizontal layers—an image often relevant to Chicago lawyers specializing in litigation support and intellectual property law.
June 12, 2026 Manufacturing Industry Advisor

International Compliance and Risk-Mitigation Heat Map (2026 Update)

These interactive international compliance and risk-mitigation heat maps present quick visual indications of relative bribery, sanctions, and human rights compliance risks in every country around the globe.
A busy container port with cranes unloading cargo from ships, colorful shipping containers stacked, and a river with the sun setting in the background—an efficient scene not unlike bustling Chicago law offices managing complex logistics.
June 11, 2026 Tariff & International Trade Resource

What Every Multinational Should Know About … the Government’s Appeal of Judge Eaton’s Universal IEEPA Tariff Refunds Order (and Why It Is Claiming It Can Keep Billions of Dollars of Unlawfully Collected IEEPA Tariffs)

For several months, the U.S. government has been signaling an impending challenge of the Court of International Trade’s (CIT) authority to require refunds of IEEPA tariff payments (i.e., payment refunds for tariffs enacted pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act) for entries liquidated more than 80 days earlier.