USPTO Director Squires released updated guidance on AI-assisted inventions. The new guidance states that AI-assisted inventions are subject to the same legal standard for determining inventorship as any other invention. Notably, the guidance rescinds the previous guidance, which applied the Pannu factors for determining inventorship, treating AI as an unnamed joint inventor. The new guidance should simplify the analysis in determining when a natural person has created an invention with assistance from AI.
There is no separate or modified [inventorship]
View referenced article
standard for AI-assisted inventions.
Author(s)
Related Insights
November 2, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Doing Business in Mexico: Detailed Contracts Are Key to Defending the Tax Treatment of Your Transactions Before the SAT
Several recent Mexican court precedents (criterios judiciales) establish that generic contracts are not, on their own, sufficient to give tax effect to transactions invoiced between the companies that enter into them.
November 2, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Recent Circuit Court Cases Examine the Limited Partner Self-Employment Tax Exception
Two recent Circuit Court of Appeals cases have provided additional guidance on the scope of the self-employment tax exception for limited partners’ distributive share of partnership income under Section 1402(a)(13).
November 2, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
In re Cloudflare: The Section 144 Safe Harbor Remains Strong, but Plaintiffs Pry Open the “Good Faith and Without Gross Negligence” Door a Little Further
The defendants won on every statutory argument, but the plaintiffs still prevailed on one point: They showed a reasonable probability that the special committee did not act “in good faith.”